[Avascular necrosis of the hip secondary to long-standing COVID]. / Necrosis avascular de cadera secundaria a COVID de larga duración.

Long COVID is a term used to describe the long-terms effects of COVID-19 infection that continue for weeks or months after the patient has recovered from COVID-19. Long COVID is defined by the persistence of symptoms beyond 12 weeks from the onset of the disease. Corticosteroids are part of the treatment in this period with good results in controlling the disease; however, it is a predisposing factor for the development of avascular necrosis. We present a clinic case of a young man of 39 years old with diagnosis of avascular necrosis in his left hip, before the administration of corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19. There is a lack of consensus about the dosage and duration of steroids required to develop avascular necrosis. Some authors have reported that cumulative dose of 2,000 mg prednisone (or its equivalent) was required for avascular necrosis development. For patients with advanced avascular necrosis stages total hip arthroplasty is an attractive option with excellent outcomes in terms of pain relief and survivorship.

El COVID de larga duración es un término que describe la enfermedad en pacientes que se recuperaron de una infección por COVID-19 y reportan síntomas por más de 12 semanas. Los corticosteroides forman parte del tratamiento en este período con buenos resultados en el control de la enfermedad; sin embargo, el uso de este grupo de medicamentos se ha descrito como un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de necrosis avascular. Se describe el caso clínico de un paciente masculino de 39 años con diagnóstico de necrosis avascular de la cadera izquierda posterior a la administración de corticosteroides para el tratamiento de COVID-19. La dosis de esteroides capaz de provocar necrosis avascular no está clara o bien descrita; sin embargo, existen reportes en la literatura donde se habla de dosis de 2,000 mg de prednisona (o equivalentes) para su desarrollo. El tratamiento de la necrosis avascular tiene como objetivo el alivio del dolor, retardar la progresión del cuadro, prevenir el colapso en etapas tempranas y restaurar la función articular. La artroplastía o recambio total de cadera parece ser una excelente opción de tratamiento quirúrgico para aquellos pacientes en etapas avanzadas.

Time elapsed from definitive diagnosis to surgery for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a nationwide observational study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: This study documents the time elapsed from the diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) to surgery, exploring the factors that influence ONFH severity. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study of a nationwide database. SETTING: The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests was applied to examine the period from definitive diagnosis of ONFH to surgery using any surgery as the end point. For bilateral cases, the date of the first surgery was the endpoint. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 2074 ONFH cases registered in 34 university hospitals and highly specialised hospitals of the multicentre sentinel monitoring system of the Japanese Investigation Committee between 1997 and 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the time from diagnosis to surgery. The secondary outcome was the proportion of subjects remaining without surgery at 3, 6 and 9 months, and at 1, 2 and 5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: The median time to surgery was 9 months (IQR 4-22 months) after diagnosis of ONFH. The time to surgery was significantly shorter in the alcohol alone group and the combined corticosteroid and alcohol group than in the corticosteroid alone group (p=0.018 and p<0.001, respectively), in early stage ONFH with no or mild joint destruction (stages II and III, p<0.001), and with joint preserving surgery (p<0.001). The proportion without surgery was 75.8% at 3 months, 59.6% at 6 months, 48.2% at 9 months, 40.5% at 1 year, 22.2% at 2 years and 8.3% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: ONFH has been considered to be an intractable disease that often requires surgical treatment, but the fact that surgery was performed in more than half of the patients within 9 months from diagnosis suggests severe disease with a significant clinical impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chiba University ID1049.

Evaluation of the long-term patient-reported outcomes after hip arthroplasty or joint preserving with Sugioka femoral osteotomy in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis.

PURPOSE: This study retrospectively evaluated long-term clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) who underwent transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy (TRO), curved varus osteotomy (CVO), and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the 109 hips in 96 patients (46 men, 50 women) who underwent CVO, TRO, or THA for ONFH treatment. The mean follow-up period for the TRO, CVO, and THA groups was 14.8, 11.5, and 13.3 years, respectively. RESULTS: The THA conversion rate of the TRO patients was significantly higher than that of the patients with CVO, and the final clinical scores in the patients with TRO did not improve compared with preoperative scores. Postoperative PROMs showed that the total and pain scores of the patients with THA were significantly higher than those of patients with TRO and CVO, while the PROM score did not change between patients with TRO and CVO. The analysis further showed that the preoperative type C2, stage 3A, or postoperative type C1 and C2 were significant predictors of decreased final PROM scores. CONCLUSION: This study found that CVO and THA are clinically effective treatments for ONFH, with significant improvements compared with preoperative scores. However, THA was associated with significantly higher PROMs and pain scores than those of CVO and TRO in long-term follow-up. Furthermore, our results suggest that postoperative PROMs depend mainly on the preoperative level of collapse and postoperative transposed intact ratio of the articular surface of the femoral head.

What are the differences in the recovery of physical function and clinical score between patients with steroid-related osteonecrosis of the femoral head and hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty? A propensity score-matched study.

PURPOSE: Steroid-related osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), arising from steroid administration for underlying diseases, represents a unique pathology for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and typically affects a younger demographic compared to osteoarthritis (OA). Given the significant age-related differences, this study aims to employ propensity score matching to align patient backgrounds between these two diseases and compare physical function. Additionally, our objective is to scrutinize the patterns of clinical score recovery over the course of one year following THA. METHODS: Using propensity score matching, 29 patients each with steroid-related ONFH and OA were selected. Muscle strength (hip abductor and knee extensor) were assessed before and after THA. Additionally, recovery of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) up to one year postoperatively was analyzed. RESULTS: The steroid-related ONFH group exhibited gender bias and significantly younger age compared to the OA group. Propensity score matching achieved balanced patient backgrounds. Physical function showed trends of lower hip abduction and knee extensor strength on the operative side in the steroid-related ONFH group. Notably, nonoperative knee extensor strength decreased significantly after matching. HHS and OHS were poor in steroid-related ONFH up to three months postoperatively but recovered after six months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with steroid-related ONFH experience positive outcomes in clinical score following THA. Propensity score matching effectively identified muscle weakness on both operative and nonoperative sides, highlighting its utility in comparative analyses.

Core decompression combined with platelet-rich plasma-augmented bone grafting for femur head necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical potential of biologic augmentation in core decompression and bone grafting for femoral head necrosis is widely acknowledged, with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) being a frequently employed biologic adjunct. However, its clinical application is not standardized, and high-level evidence is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of core decompression and bone grafting combined with PRP for femur head necrosis. METHODS: Several databases were systematically retrieved for randomized controlled trials comparing core decompression and bone grafting combined with or without PRP. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. The study is registered with PROSPERO under the code CRD42022361007, and it is also listed in the research registry under the identification number reviewregistry1537. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 642 participants (742 hips) were included. The pooled estimates revealed that when core decompression and bone grafting were combined with PRP, the Harris hip score (mean difference: 7.98; 95% CI: 5.77-10.20; P <0.001), visual analog scale (SMD: -0.68; 95% CI: -0.96 - -0.40; P <0.001) and the pain component of Harris hip score (SMD: 8.4; 95% CI: 4.12-12.68; P <0.001), and reduction of radiographic progression [risk ratio (RR): 0.40; 95% CI: 0.27-0.59; P <0.001] were superior to core decompression and bone grafting alone. Fewer patients with treatment failure (RR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.14-0.52; P <0.001) and higher good-to-excellent results (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.17-1.86; P <0.001) were observed in treatment groups than control groups. Meanwhile, the pooled analysis substantiated the superior safety profile of PRP (RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.11-0.77; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of core decompression and bone grafting with PRP is superior to the approach without PRP, demonstrating enhanced effectiveness in terms of function, pain relief, and radiographic progression. Additionally, it results in lower rates of treatment failure and adverse events. However, further high-quality RCTs are needed to evaluate their effectiveness due to methodological and implementation limitations observed in the existing evidence.

Is there still an indication for the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in femoral head osteonecrosis?

PURPOSE: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a progressive hip disease. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a preferred surgical procedure among hip arthroplasty performed in young patients. The aim of this study is to show the long-term clinical and radiological results of HRA procedures performed for patients suffering from ONFH. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent hip resurfacing with the diagnosis of femoral head osteonecrosis were included in the study. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used for clinical scoring of the patients. The blood chromium, cobalt, white blood cell (WBC) count, and CRP levels of patients were checked. Ultrasonography (USG) was performed for all patients at mid-term control checked for pseudo-tumours. For the radiological evaluation, acetabular inclination, stem shaft angle, prothesis-to-neck ratio, osteolysis zones, and heterotopic ossification were used. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 46.6 ± 9.3 years, and the mean follow-up period was 11.83 ± 2.9 years. The mean HHS was 90.3 ± 12.8 for final follow-up. The mean WBC value was 8.2 109/L, mean CRP value was 6.3 mg/L, mean chromium value was 4.9 µg/L, and mean cobalt value was 1.8 µg/L. Inclination changing 0.2°(p = 0.788), stem shaft angle changing 0.7°(p = 0.424), and neck-to-prosthesis ratio changing 0.01°(p = 0.075). No pseudo-tumours were detected in any patients in USG examination. CONCLUSION: HRA provides long-term implant survival and excellent clinical outcomes for end-stage ONFH patients with low complication rates.

Evaluation of core decompression outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus with hip osteonecrosis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis is a major cause of morbidity for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although core decompression is an approved and trusted technique to prevent further joint deterioration, this surgical method seems to be less beneficial for SLE patients. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of core decompression in SLE patients with primary stages of femoral head osteonecrosis. METHODS: In this study, 23 patients (39 affected hip joints) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head with stage II of the disease, based on the Ficat-Arlet classification system, underwent core decompression. Also, patients demographic characteristics, clinical data, medication history, comorbidities, immunological findings, hip plain radiographs, history of total hip arthroplasty after core decompression, and patients satisfaction with joint function according to the Oxford hip score questionnaire were obtained. RESULTS: In the study, 53.8% of affected joints showed signs of radiographic deterioration in follow-up imaging. Sixty-one and a half percent (61.5%) of patients had unsatisfactory joint performance. A third (33.3%) of affected hip joints underwent total hip arthroplasty up to 5 years from core decompression. SLE patients with a history of receiving bisphosphonate were 83.2% less dissatisfied with their joint function than patients without a history of bisphosphonate use (P < 0.02). Of the 23 studied cases, the mean cumulative dose of prednisolone before and after core decompression surgery was 46.41 mg and 14.74 mg respectively. Besides, one case (2.6%) that had a high anti-phospholipid antibodies level during follow-up did not have any radiographic deterioration, and 9 cases (23.1%) had some degrees of radiographic deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: The patients group that used bis-phosphonate, had a higher level of satisfaction with joint function after core decompression. Patients with high-level anti-phospholipid antibodies are related to a poor prognosis after core decompression.

Network meta-analysis of invasive treatment for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common disabling disease in orthopedics. Blocking the progression of ONFH in the early stage is essential for avoiding total hip replacement. PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of invasive treatment on early-stage ONFH. METHODS: According to the PRISMA guidelines, relevant English databases were searched in August 2022 to collect published research. Extract result indicators and conduct network meta-analysis using R software. RESULTS: A total of 15 RCTs were included. All patients were diagnosed with early-stage ONFH. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed that CD + BMMSC and CD + PRP were the most effective in improving HHS. The results of the league table showed that CD + BMMSC was superior to CD alone. Meanwhile, the SUCRA for FR showed that CD + BG + BMMSC was the most likely to be the most effective in reducing FR. The league table revealed that CD + BG, CD + BG + BMMSC, and CD + BMMSC were superior to CD alone, with statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: Considering the HHS and FR, CD + BMMSC may be the optimal treatment option to effectively delay the progression of ONFH and restore the postoperative function of patients. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study protocol has been registered on the PROSPERO platform (CRD42023380169).

Hip Arthroscopy Debridement Combined with Multiple Small-Diameter Fan-Shaped Low-Speed Drilling Decompression in the Treatment of Early and Middle Stage Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: 14 Years Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a disease that occurs frequently in young and middle-aged people. Because of its high disability rate, it affects the ability to work, so the early treatment of this disease is particularly important. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of hip arthroscopy combined with multiple small-diameter fan-shaped low-speed drilling decompression (MSFLD) in treating early-mid stage ONFH (ARCO II-IIIA) compared to MSFLD, with at least 10-year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 234 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy and MSFLD for ONFH from 1998 to 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. This study enrolled patients between 18 and 60 years old with ARCO stage II-III A, diagnosed clinically and through imaging, in accordance with the 2021 guidelines for the treatment of ONFH. Clinical data, including demographics, operation mode, BMI, pre- and postoperative Harris score, and femoral head survival rate, were collected. Patients were divided into hip arthroscopy + MSFLD and MSFLD groups based on the operation mode. The t-test was used to compare the postoperative efficacy, Harris scores, and survival rates of the femoral head between the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 234 patients, 160 cases were followed up, including 92 cases in the hip arthroscopy + MSFLD group and 68 cases in MSFLD group, the follow-up rate was 68.38%, and the follow-up time was (10-22)14.11 ± 3.06 years. The Harris score (80.65 ± 6.29) in the hip arthroscopy + MSFLD group was significantly higher than that in the MSFLD group (p = 0.00), and the survival rate of femoral head (5-year survival rate was 84.78%, 10-year survival rate was 23.91%) was also higher than that in the MSFLD group (5-year survival rate was 63.24%, 10-year survival rate was 8.82%). The 5-year and 10-year survival rates of patients with ARCO II were 82.11% and 28.42%, which were better than 54% and 33% for ARCO III A. The femur head survival rate of alcoholic ONFH (5-year survival rate 61.54%, 10-year survival rate 9.23%) was significantly higher than that of other types of ONFH. CONCLUSION: Clinical follow-up of at least 10 years suggests that hip arthroscopy combined with MSFLD is an effective treatment for early-mid stage ONFH, with good clinical effect and high survival rate of femoral head.

The Preserved Thickness Ratio of the Femoral Head Contributes to the Collapse Predictor of Osteonecrosis.

OBJECTIVES: The collapse of femoral head is a serious symptom of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), resulting in hip pain and deformity. However, it is hardly possible to reestablish the femoral head nonoperatively once the collapse happens. Predicting femoral head collapse is of great value for the prognosis of ONFH. This study aimed to develop a new method to quantify the preserved thickness of femoral head and to assess its diagnostic contribution in predicting femoral head collapse on plain radiographs. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 101 hips (85 patients) with ARCO stage II from January 2008 to December 2016 were included in this study. The preserved thickness was measured on standard anteroposterior (AP) and frog-leg (FL) radiographs. The anteroposterior view's preserved thickness ratio (APTR) and the frog-leg view's preserved thickness ratio (FPTR) were calculated to show the preserved thickness ratio of the femoral head anteriorly and laterally. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the risk factors for collapse. Sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off values for APTR and FPTR were determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis was applied to determine femoral head survival in ONFH patients. RESULTS: The mean age of the 27 females and 58 males was 38.93 years old. The mean follow-up time was 74.62 (36-124) months in the non-collapse group and 18.66 (3-82) months in the collapse group. Femoral head collapse was observed in 62 hips during the follow-up period. Logistic regression analysis and ROC results showed that APTR <24.79% and FPTR <10.62% were significantly correlated with femoral head collapse. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve suggested that the overall survival rate of APTR ≥24.79% was 68.2% at 5 and 10 years and FPTR ≥10.62% was 71.63% at 5 and 10 years. At the last follow-up, 26 hips had collapse on the anterior side of the femoral head, 12 hips occurred on the lateral side, and 24 hips happened to collapse on both anterior and lateral sides. CONCLUSION: Femoral head collapse predominantly occurred anteriorly rather than laterally in ONFH patients. The measurements of APTR and FPTR have noticeable implications for the prediction of femoral head collapse, and contribute to the selection of treatment options for ONFH patients with types B and C1 according to the JIC classification.

Regenerative therapies for femoral head necrosis in the past two decades: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Regenerative techniques combined with core decompression (CD) are commonly used to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, no consensus exists on regeneration therapy combined with CD that performs optimally. Therefore, we evaluated six regenerative therapies combined with CD treatment using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Six common regeneration techniques were categorized into the following groups with CD as the control group: (1) autologous bone graft (ABG), (2) autologous bone graft combined with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ABG + BMAC), (3) bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), (4) free vascular autologous bone graft (FVBG), (5) expanded mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and (6) platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and progression rate to femoral head necrosis were compared among the six treatments. RESULT: A total of 17 literature were included in this study. In the NMA, two of the six treatment strategies demonstrated higher response in preventing the progression of ONFH than CD: MSCs (odds ratio [OR]: 0.098, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0087-0.87) and BMAC (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.073-0.73). Additionally, two of the six treatment strategies were effective techniques in preventing the conversion of ONFH to THA: MSCs (OR: 0.062, 95% CI: 0.0038-0.40) and BMAC (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.1-0.074). No significant difference was found among FVBG, PRP, ABG + BMAC, ABG, and CD in preventing ONFH progression and conversion to THA (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our NMA found that MSCs and BMAC were effective in preventing ONFH progression and conversion to THA among the six regenerative therapies. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking value, MSCs ranked first, followed by BMAC. Additionally, based on our NMA results, MSCs and BMAC following CD may be necessary to prevent ONFH progression and conversion to THA. Therefore, these findings provide evidence for the use of regenerative therapy for ONFH.

Influence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head on hip prosthesis integration: a radiological analysis.

BACKGROUND: Avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) often results in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The cause for increased THA revision rates among patients with AVN is not yet fully understood. PURPOSE: To perform a comparative radiological analysis of implant integration between patients with AVN and osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: After a matched pair analysis of 58 patients, 30 received THA due to OA, 28 due to AVN. X-ray images were evaluated after one week ("baseline") and on average 37.58 months postoperatively ("endline"). The prosthesis was grouped into 10 regions of interest (ROI): seven femoral and three acetabular. Incidence, width, and extent of "radiolucent lines" were measured within each zone. RESULTS: Between baseline and endline, width and extent progressed more noticeably in all femoral and acetabular zones among patients with AVN. In femoral ROI 1, the width increased in 40% of AVN cases compared to 6.7% of OA cases. For acetabular ROI 3, the width increased in 26.7% of AVN cases compared to no perceived changes in the OA group. No signs of prosthetic loosening were found in the AVN group. CONCLUSION: The increase of width and extent of radiolucent lines over time in patients with AVN could be a sign of lack of osteointegration. However, prosthetic loosening in absence of clinical symptoms cannot be deduced from radiological findings after medium-term postoperative follow-up. Further long-term studies are required to monitor how radiolucent lines develop in respect to long-term implant loosening. Dependent on bone quality, individually adapted reaming and broaching of the implant site are recommended.

Is COVID-19 an independent risk factor for the development of avascular necrosis of the hip? A retrospective study to evaluate the factors associated with avascular necrosis of the hip in patients who had COVID-19 infection.

PURPOSE: The cumulative effect of hyper-coagulative COVID-19 disease and using steroids leads to increased avascular necrosis (AVN) hip incidence. This study aims to correlate the various factors of COVID-19 infection with the occurrence of AVN hip. METHODS: It is a retrospective cross-sectional study of non-traumatic AVN hip patients with a history of COVID-19 infection. A total number of 50 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. The following details were obtained: (a) patient's demographics, (b) COVID-19: interval of infection and groin pain, duration of symptoms, severity, steroid intake, (c) AVN hip: involved side, Ficat-Arlet staging. RESULTS: The mean age was 36.3 years (range: 20-60), and body mass index (BMI) was 25.13 kg/m2 (range: 18.50-31.50). There were 45 males and five females. Sixty percent (30) of patients managed at home, 24% (12) required admission into the ward, 2% (1) were in ICU only, and 14% (7) admitted to both ICU and ward. The mean interval of COVID-19 infection and onset of hip pain was 359.02 days (range: 10-822 days). Thirty-eight percent (19) patients required steroids (injection and oral), 46% (23) took steroids (oral only), whereas 16% (8) recovered without steroids. The stage of AVN correlated with the severity of COVID-19 infection (p-value -0.038) and significant improvement in VAS and HHS after treatment in each stage. The mean follow-up was 9.79 months (6-19 months). CONCLUSION: A low-dose steroid intake with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection produces an additive effect on the development of AVN hip. Most affected individuals were adult males, and stage II AVN was the most common, managed with bisphosphonates and core decompression for short intervals.

Extension of the Antero-Posterior Necrotic Regions Associated With Collapse Cessation in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

BACKGROUND: Collapse cessation is of utmost importance following a long period of collapse due to osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study investigated the relationship between collapse cessation and the extent of the necrotic regions of ONFH. METHODS: Overall, 74 patients who had symptomatic ONFH (collapse < 3 mm) at the first visit with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were included in this study. Patients were categorized based on collapse progression or cessation into the progression and stable groups. The extent of the antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral necrotic regions between the groups was assessed using sagittal and coronal sections of T1-magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, the most effective cutoff value was determined from the receiving operating characteristic curve where collapse cessation could be obtained, while the survival rates were determined with collapse progression as the endpoints were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 45 and 29 patients were in the progression and stable groups, respectively. The AP and medio-lateral necrotic regions were significantly different (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively) between the progression and stable groups. A cutoff value of 62.1% of the AP necrotic regions was determined from the receiving operating characteristic curve analysis. The 5-year survival rates with collapse progression as the endpoints were 5.4 and 77.8% in the AP necrotic regions of ≥62.1 and <62.1%, respectively (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Cases with AP necrotic regions of ≤62.1% can be expected to have collapse cessation, which could be a useful index for ONFH treatment strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Sclerosis rim volume ratio and Japanese Investigation Committee classification as predictive factors for femoral head collapse progression after non-vascularized fibular grafting in osteonecrosis patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the relationship between sclerosis rim volume ratio (SVR) and the progression of femoral head collapse after non-vascularized fibular grafting (NVFG) surgery in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), investigating risk factors associated with femoral head collapse progression and establishing a predictive model to enhance clinical decision-making. METHODS: ONFH patients who underwent NVFG between January 2008 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively to assess the risk of post-operative collapse progression (collapse >2 mm). A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the independent risk factors associated with collapse progression, including age, sex, etiology, affected side, Japanese Investigation Committee classification (JIC), and the sclerosis rim volume ratio (SVR). SVR values was collected from three weight-bearing columns, namely SVR1, SVR2, and SVR3, respectively. RESULTS: 57 patients with 64 hips who had undergone NVFG and were followed up for at least one year were included. During the follow-up, collapse＞2 mm occurred in 30 hips (46.88%). Multivariable analysis revealed that JIC (p =0.037) and SVR1 (p = 0.04) were independent risk factors for collapse progression after NVFG. The results of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that the aforementioned indices provided a satisfactory prediction of early femoral head collapse progression in ONFH patients after NVFG. The regression model using the above two indicators as a composite index showed satisfactory performance in predicting early postoperative femoral head collapse progression, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 84.6%. CONCLUSIONS: SVR is significant predictor of post-operative collapse progression following NVFG, and the composite index provides an optimal predictive value for femoral head collapse progression after surgery.

Development and Validation of an Automated Classification System for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Using Deep Learning Approach: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate classification can facilitate the selection of appropriate interventions to delay the progression of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study aimed to perform the classification of ONFH through a deep learning approach. METHODS: We retrospectively sampled 1,806 midcoronal magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 1,337 hips from 4 institutions. Of these, 1,472 midcoronal MRIs of 1,155 hips were divided into training, validation, and test datasets with a ratio of 7:1:2 to develop a convolutional neural network model (CNN). An additional 334 midcoronal MRIs of 182 hips were used to perform external validation. The predictive performance of the CNN and the review panel was also compared. RESULTS: A multiclass CNN model was successfully developed. In internal validation, the overall accuracy of the CNN for predicting the severity of ONFH based on the Japanese Investigation Committee classification was 87.8%. The macroaverage values of area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, and F-value were 0.90, 84.8, 84.8, and 84.6%, respectively. In external validation, the overall accuracy of the CNN was 83.8%. The macroaverage values of area under the curve, precision, recall, and F-value were 0.87, 79.5, 80.5, and 79.9%, respectively. In a human-machine comparison study, the CNN outperformed or was comparable to that of the deputy chief orthopaedic surgeons. CONCLUSION: The CNN is feasible and robust for classifying ONFH and correctly locating the necrotic area. These findings suggest that classifying ONFH using deep learning with high accuracy and generalizability may aid in predicting femoral head collapse and clinical decision-making.

Pathological fracture increases the risk of unsatisfactory functional results and avascular necrosis in children with proximal femur simple bone cysts.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal femur simple bone cysts (SBCs) are rare in children, but with a risk of pathological fractures and the associated poor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes of children with proximal femur SBCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 38 children with proximal femur SBCs treated surgically at our department, West China hospital, were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether pathological fractures presented before treatment. The non-fracture group received treatment of open curettage, cavity electrocauterization, bone grafting, and fixation (proximal femoral plate, intramedullary nail or Kirschner wire). The pathological fracture group received the same procedures of curettage, electrocauterization, grafting, and fixation. Autogenous iliac bone grafting was done in all cases, and the artificial bone was used as a supplementary based on the size of the cavity. Postoperatively, all patients underwent hip spica or similar orthosis immobilization for six weeks and received the same rehabilitation program after the removal of hip spica. Patients were evaluated by two independent observers, including the functional results based on the Ratliff's criteria, avascular necrosis, healing rate based on the Neer scoring system, coxa vara, and premature physeal arrest. We described the good outcome in Ratliff's criteria as "Satisfactory results", and fair and poor outcomes as "Unsatisfactory results." Grade 1 and grade 2 Neer results were termed as failures in treatment, and grades 3 and 4 were considered successes and healing. RESULTS: 38 patients with 38 hips (18 on the left side and 20 on the right side) were evaluated, including 9 females and 29 males, with a mean age of 9.0±2.6 years old (range, 5 to 14 years). There was no significant difference between these two groups in the baseline data of gender, age, side, grafting, staging, and fixation methods. The rate of unsatisfactory functional results in the pathological fractures group was 56.3% (9/16), significantly higher than that in patients without fracture (22.7%, 5/22. p= 0.047). There was also a significant difference in avascular necrosis of the femoral head between the pathological fractures group (7/16) and the group without fracture (2/22, p=0.021). Thirty cases presented with healing, including 13 in the fractures group and 17 in the non-fracture group (p=1.000), and eight cases were graded as failures (2 cases of grade 1 and 6 cases of grade 2). There were also no significant differences between these two groups in premature physeal arrest (2 in fracture group and 1 in non-fracture group, P=0.562), and Coxa vara (3 in the fracture group and 0 in non-fracture group, P=0.066). CONCLUSIONS: Pathological fracture significantly increases the risk of unsatisfactory functional results and avascular necrosis of the femoral head in patients with femoral neck SBCs. Prophylactic treatment and fixation of SBCs in weight bearing proximal femur region is better to manage without complications than managing with pathological fractures.

The Duration of Hardware Retention After Radiologic Union of Surgically Treated Femoral Neck Fractures in Children May Predict the Aggravation or Occurrence of Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head or Neck After Hardware Removal.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of aggravation or occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN) following hardware removal in surgically treated pediatric femoral neck fractures who achieved radiologic consolidation is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for this complication. METHODS: Seventy-one pediatric (mean age: 9.8±3.9 y) were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors (age, sex, laterality, severity of initial displacement, type of fracture, time from trauma to reduction, reduction and fixation method, quality of reduction, time required to achieve radiologic union, duration of hardware retention, presence of AVN before hardware removal and follow-up time) were recorded. The severity of AVN was assessed based on radiographs with Ratliff's classification. RESULTS: Following hardware removal, the aggravation/occurrence of AVN was detected in 11 hips (15.5%). Among the 5 hips (7%) with aggravation of AVN, 1 (1.4%) with type II AVN and 3 (4.2%) with type III AVN exhibited aggravation of type I AVN, while the remaining hip (1.4%; type I) showed enlargement of the involved AVN area. Six hips (8.5%) developed AVN following hardware removal: 2 (2.8%) were classified as type I and 4 (5.6%) as type III. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that hardware retention >7 months after union is associated with a decreased rate of aggravation or occurrence of AVN of the femoral neck or head following hardware removal. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of aggravation or occurrence of AVN following hardware removal in surgically treated pediatric femoral neck fractures is 15.5%; hardware retention >7 months after radiologic union may reduce the risk of aggravation or occurrence of AVN of the femoral neck or head postimplant removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.